Commit graph

94 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
JakobDev
aaa1094663
Add the ability to pin Issues (#24406)
This adds the ability to pin important Issues and Pull Requests. You can
also move pinned Issues around to change their Position. Resolves #2175.

## Screenshots

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235123207-0aa39869-bb48-45c3-abe2-ba1e836046ec.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235123297-152a16ea-a857-451d-9a42-61f2cd54dd75.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235640782-cbfe25ec-6254-479a-a3de-133e585d7a2d.png)

The Design was mostly copied from the Projects Board.

## Implementation
This uses a new `pin_order` Column in the `issue` table. If the value is
set to 0, the Issue is not pinned. If it's set to a bigger value, the
value is the Position. 1 means it's the first pinned Issue, 2 means it's
the second one etc. This is dived into Issues and Pull requests for each
Repo.

## TODO
- [x] You can currently pin as many Issues as you want. Maybe we should
add a Limit, which is configurable. GitHub uses 3, but I prefer 6, as
this is better for bigger Projects, but I'm open for suggestions.
- [x] Pin and Unpin events need to be added to the Issue history.
- [x] Tests
- [x] Migration

**The feature itself is currently fully working, so tester who may find
weird edge cases are very welcome!**

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
谈笑风生间
309354c70e
New webhook trigger for receiving Pull Request review requests (#24481)
close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/16321

Provided a webhook trigger for requesting someone to review the Pull
Request.

Some modifications have been made to the returned `PullRequestPayload`
based on the GitHub webhook settings, including:
- add a description of the current reviewer object as
`RequestedReviewer` .
- setting the action to either **review_requested** or
**review_request_removed** based on the operation.
- adding the `RequestedReviewers` field to the issues_model.PullRequest.
This field will be loaded into the PullRequest through
`LoadRequestedReviewers()` when `ToAPIPullRequest` is called.

After the Pull Request is merged, I will supplement the relevant
documentation.
2023-05-24 22:06:27 -04:00
yp05327
a3a8594f75
Fix 500 error when select No assignee filter in issue list page (#24854)
Access the issue list page and select `No assignee`, you will get 500
error:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/18380374/a7435fd3-c3d5-4801-894e-9353a8ddc1af)

You can see this page in try.gitea.io:

https://try.gitea.io/yp05327/testrepo/issues?q=&type=all&sort=&state=open&labels=&milestone=0&project=0&assignee=-1&poster=0

Caused by
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24707/files#diff-d7c7dc2da4fcfdc09997648e11a018414dc116472054350b5590ab407adcd44dR1748

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-22 13:08:27 +02:00
wxiaoguang
4647660776
Rewrite logger system (#24726)
## ⚠️ Breaking

The `log.<mode>.<logger>` style config has been dropped. If you used it,
please check the new config manual & app.example.ini to make your
instance output logs as expected.

Although many legacy options still work, it's encouraged to upgrade to
the new options.

The SMTP logger is deleted because SMTP is not suitable to collect logs.

If you have manually configured Gitea log options, please confirm the
logger system works as expected after upgrading.

## Description

Close #12082 and maybe more log-related issues, resolve some related
FIXMEs in old code (which seems unfixable before)

Just like rewriting queue #24505 : make code maintainable, clear legacy
bugs, and add the ability to support more writers (eg: JSON, structured
log)

There is a new document (with examples): `logging-config.en-us.md`

This PR is safer than the queue rewriting, because it's just for
logging, it won't break other logic.

## The old problems

The logging system is quite old and difficult to maintain:
* Unclear concepts: Logger, NamedLogger, MultiChannelledLogger,
SubLogger, EventLogger, WriterLogger etc
* Some code is diffuclt to konw whether it is right:
`log.DelNamedLogger("console")` vs `log.DelNamedLogger(log.DEFAULT)` vs
`log.DelLogger("console")`
* The old system heavily depends on ini config system, it's difficult to
create new logger for different purpose, and it's very fragile.
* The "color" trick is difficult to use and read, many colors are
unnecessary, and in the future structured log could help
* It's difficult to add other log formats, eg: JSON format
* The log outputer doesn't have full control of its goroutine, it's
difficult to make outputer have advanced behaviors
* The logs could be lost in some cases: eg: no Fatal error when using
CLI.
* Config options are passed by JSON, which is quite fragile.
* INI package makes the KEY in `[log]` section visible in `[log.sub1]`
and `[log.sub1.subA]`, this behavior is quite fragile and would cause
more unclear problems, and there is no strong requirement to support
`log.<mode>.<logger>` syntax.


## The new design

See `logger.go` for documents.


## Screenshot

<details>


![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/4462d713-ba39-41f5-bb08-de912e67e1ff)


![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/b188035e-f691-428b-8b2d-ff7b2199b2f9)


![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/132e9745-1c3b-4e00-9e0d-15eaea495dee)

</details>

## TODO

* [x] add some new tests
* [x] fix some tests
* [x] test some sub-commands (manually ....)

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-21 22:35:11 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
64f6a5d113
Use CommentList instead of []*Comment (#24828)
As title.
2023-05-21 20:48:28 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
38cf43d060
Some refactors for issues stats (#24793)
This PR

- [x] Move some functions from `issues.go` to `issue_stats.go` and
`issue_label.go`
- [x] Remove duplicated issue options `UserIssueStatsOption` to keep
only one `IssuesOptions`
2023-05-19 22:17:48 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
09ab64dfad
Remove duplicated issues options and some more refactors (#24787)
This PR 

- [x] Move some code from `issue.go` to `issue_search.go` and
`issue_update.go`
- [x] Use `IssuesOptions` instead of `IssueStatsOptions` becuase they
are too similiar.
- [x] Rename some functions
2023-05-18 10:45:25 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
b807d2f620
Support no label/assignee filter and batch clearing labels/assignees (#24707)
Since milestones has been implemented, this PR will fix #3407

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
2023-05-17 17:21:35 +08:00
Hester Gong
ea7954f069
Modify luminance calculation and extract related functions into single files (#24586)
Close #24508

Main changes:
As discussed in the issue

1. Change luminance calculation function to use [Relative
Luminance](https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Relative_luminance)
2. Move the luminance related functions into color.go/color.js
3. Add tests for both the files (Not sure if test cases are too many
now)

Before (tests included by `UseLightTextOnBackground` are labels started
with `##`):
https://try.gitea.io/HesterG/testrepo/labels

After:
<img width="1307" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-08 at 13 37 55"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17645053/236742562-fdfc3a4d-2fab-466b-9613-96f2bf96b4bc.png">
<img width="1289" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-08 at 13 38 06"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17645053/236742570-022db68e-cec0-43bb-888a-fc54f5332cc3.png">
<img width="1299" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-08 at 13 38 20"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17645053/236742572-9af1de45-fb7f-460b-828d-ba25fae20f51.png">

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-10 11:19:03 +00:00
silverwind
ae0fa64ef6
Review fixes and enhancements (#24526)
- Fix regression with icons wrapping from
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24459
- Fix box misalignment on small screen
- Fix avatar misalignment on review comment
- Fix incorrect underline hover effect on review icons
- Move status icon to left side in review box
- Enhance review icon colors, add helper function for it
- Add missing inline avatars in review comments
- Tweak icon sizes because some octicons have inconsistent sizing

### Before
<img width="655" alt="Screenshot 2023-05-04 at 20 50 28"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/115237/236301230-92325507-6e03-47ac-bfb4-c9ddde310571.png">
<img width="260" alt="Screenshot 2023-05-04 at 20 50 42"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/115237/236301236-0dfa50e7-b8fc-4179-ae68-d872bc90f1f3.png">

### After
<img width="498" alt="Screenshot 2023-05-04 at 20 55 08"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/115237/236301810-23862c2c-c0a9-43a4-a3eb-ee611c14a7f4.png">
<img width="219" alt="Screenshot 2023-05-04 at 20 55 16"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/115237/236301817-d0de02ea-6ab5-43e1-9183-6b3848b72995.png">

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-10 09:16:44 +00:00
sillyguodong
e962ade99c
Refresh the refernce of the closed PR when reopening (#24231)
Close #24213 
Replace #23830

#### Cause

- Before, in order to making PR can get latest commit after reopening,
the `ref`(${REPO_PATH}/refs/pull/${PR_INDEX}/head) of evrey closed PR
will be updated when pushing commits to the `head branch` of the closed
PR.

#### Changes

- For closed PR , won't perform these behavior: insert`comment`, push
`notification` (UI and email), exectue
[pushToBaseRepo](7422503341/services/pull/pull.go (L409))
function and trigger `action` any more when pushing to the `head branch`
of the closed PR.
- Refresh the reference of the PR when reopening the closed PR (**even
if the head branch has been deleted before**). Make the reference of PR
consistent with the `head branch`.
2023-05-08 14:39:32 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
377a0a20f0
Merge setting.InitXXX into one function with options (#24389)
This PR will merge 3 Init functions on setting packages as 1 and
introduce an options struct.
2023-05-04 11:55:35 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
3f0651d4d6
Improve milestone filter on issues page (#22423)
Now we have `All milestones`, `No milestones`, `Open milestones` and
`Closed milestones`.
Fix #11924
Fix #22411 

<img width="1166" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/212243375-95eea035-a972-44b8-8088-53db614cb07e.png">
2023-04-30 09:12:49 -04:00
Jason Song
066af372e3
Load reviewer for comments when dismissing a review (#24281)
If a comment dismisses a review, we need to load the reviewer to show
whose review has been dismissed.

Related to:

20b6ae0e53/templates/repo/issue/view_content/comments.tmpl (L765-L770)

We don't need `.Review.Reviewer` for all comments, because
"dismissing" doesn't happen often, or we would have already received
error reports.
2023-04-23 11:04:23 -04:00
KN4CK3R
f1173d6879
Use more specific test methods (#24265)
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-04-22 17:56:27 -04:00
wxiaoguang
de2268ffab
Fix issue attachment handling (#24202)
Close #24195

Some of the changes are taken from my another fix
f07b0de997
in #20147 (although that PR was discarded ....)


The bug is:

1. The old code doesn't handle `removedfile` event correctly
2. The old code doesn't provide attachments for type=CommentTypeReview


This PR doesn't intend to refactor the "upload" code to a perfect state
(to avoid making the review difficult), so some legacy styles are kept.

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-04-20 02:39:44 -04:00
wxiaoguang
cfe3d6e9b5
Make more functions use ctx instead of db.DefaultContext (#24068)
Continue the "ctx refactoring" work.

There are still a lot db.DefaultContext, incorrect context could cause
database deadlock errors.
2023-04-14 14:18:28 -04:00
Yarden Shoham
97176754be
Localize milestone related time strings (#24051)
- With #23988 in place, we can improve these timestamps

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-04-12 02:29:49 -04:00
qwerty287
3cab9c6b0c
Add API to manage issue dependencies (#17935)
Adds API endpoints to manage issue/PR dependencies
* `GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` List issues that are
blocked by this issue
* `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` Block the issue
given in the body by the issue in path
* `DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` Unblock the issue
given in the body by the issue in path
* `GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` List an
issue's dependencies
* `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` Create a new
issue dependencies
* `DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` Remove an
issue dependency

Closes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/15393
Closes #22115

Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2023-03-28 13:23:25 -04:00
techknowlogick
03591f0f95
add user rename endpoint to admin api (#22789)
this is a simple endpoint that adds the ability to rename users to the
admin API.

Note: this is not in a mergeable state. It would be better if this was
handled by a PATCH/POST to the /api/v1/admin/users/{username} endpoint
and the username is modified.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
2023-03-14 03:45:21 -04:00
sillyguodong
2f49b55c19
Fix cannot reopen after pushing commits to a closed PR (#23189)
Close: #22784

1. On GH, we can reopen a PR which was closed before after pushing
commits. After reopening PR, we can see the commits that were pushed
after closing PR in the time line. So the case of
[issue](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22784) is a bug which
needs to be fixed.

2. After closing a PR and pushing commits, `headBranchSha` is not equal
to `sha`(which is the last commit ID string of reference). If the
judgement exists, the button of reopen will not display. So, skip the
judgement if the status of PR is closed.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222037529-651fccf9-0bba-433e-b2f0-79c17e0cc812.png)

3. Even if PR is already close, we should still insert comment record
into DB when we push commits.
So we should still call  function `CreatePushPullComment()`.

067b0c2664/services/pull/pull.go (L260-L282)
So, I add a switch(`includeClosed`) to the
`GetUnmergedPullRequestsByHeadInfo` func to control whether the status
of PR must be open. In this case, by setting `includeClosed` to `true`,
we can query the closed PR.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222621045-bb80987c-10c5-4eac-aa0c-1fb9c6aefb51.png)

4. In the loop of comments, I use the`latestCloseCommentID` variable to
record the last occurrence of the close comment.
In the go template, if the status of PR is closed, the comments whose
type is `CommentTypePullRequestPush(29)` after `latestCloseCommentID`
won't be rendered.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222058913-c91cf3e3-819b-40c5-8015-654b31eeccff.png)
e.g.
1). The initial status of the PR is opened.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222453617-33c5093e-f712-4cd6-8489-9f87e2075869.png)
2). Then I click the button of `Close`.  PR is closed now.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222453694-25c588a9-c121-4897-9ae5-0b13cf33d20b.png)
3). I try to push a commit to this PR, even though its current status is
closed.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222453916-361678fb-7321-410d-9e37-5a26e8095638.png)
But in comments list, this commit do not display.This is as expected :)

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222454169-7617a791-78d2-404e-be5e-77d555f93313.png)
4). Click the `Reopen` button, the commit which is pushed after closing
PR display now.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222454533-897893b6-b96e-4701-b5cb-b1800f382b8f.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-03-03 21:16:58 +08:00
Lauris BH
58b4143803
Add loading yaml label template files (#22976)
Extract from #11669 and enhancement to #22585 to support exclusive
scoped labels in label templates

* Move label template functionality to label module
* Fix handling of color codes
* Add Advanced label template
2023-03-02 01:44:23 +02:00
Brecht Van Lommel
df48af2229
Order pull request conflict checking by recently updated, for each push (#23220)
When a change is pushed to the default branch and many pull requests are
open for that branch, conflict checking can take some time.

Previously it would go from oldest to newest pull request. Now
prioritize pull requests that are likely being actively worked on or
prepared for merging.

This only changes the order within one push to one repository, but the
change is trivial and can already be quite helpful for smaller Gitea
instances where a few repositories have most pull requests. A global
order would require deeper changes to queues.
2023-03-01 14:14:02 -05:00
zeripath
ef4fc30246
Speed up HasUserStopwatch & GetActiveStopwatch (#23051)
GetActiveStopwatch & HasUserStopwatch is a hot piece of code that is
repeatedly called and on examination of the cpu profile for TestGit it
represents 0.44 seconds of CPU time. This PR reduces this time to 80ms.

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <leon@kske.dev>
2023-02-27 13:46:00 -05:00
Brecht Van Lommel
10cdcb9ea8
Add "Reviewed by you" filter for pull requests (#22927)
This includes pull requests that you approved, requested changes or
commented on. Currently such pull requests are not visible in any of the
filters on /pulls, while they may need further action like merging, or
prodding the author or reviewers.

Especially when working with a large team on a repository it's helpful
to get a full overview of pull requests that may need your attention,
without having to sift through the complete list.
2023-02-24 21:55:50 -05:00
zeripath
d827215011
Fix DBConsistency checks on MSSQL (#23132)
Unfortunately xorm's `builder.Select(...).From(...)` does not escape the
table names. This is mostly not a problem but is a problem with the
`user` table.

This PR simply escapes the user table. No other uses of `From("user")`
where found in the codebase so I think this should be all that is
needed.

Fix #23064

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2023-02-24 16:45:55 -05:00
zeripath
35d2fa744a
Fix intermittent panic in notify issue change content (#23019)
Ensure that issue pullrequests are loaded before trying to set the
self-reference.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <leon@kske.dev>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2023-02-20 19:15:49 -05:00
yp05327
f4ce8c73fb
Improve issues.LoadProject (#22982)
issues.LoadProject() is no use
change `issues.loadProject(ctx)` to issues.LoadProject(ctx)
2023-02-20 13:21:56 -06:00
Lunny Xiao
c53ad052d8
Refactor the setting to make unit test easier (#22405)
Some bugs caused by less unit tests in fundamental packages. This PR
refactor `setting` package so that create a unit test will be easier
than before.

- All `LoadFromXXX` files has been splited as two functions, one is
`InitProviderFromXXX` and `LoadCommonSettings`. The first functions will
only include the code to create or new a ini file. The second function
will load common settings.
- It also renames all functions in setting from `newXXXService` to
`loadXXXSetting` or `loadXXXFrom` to make the function name less
confusing.
- Move `XORMLog` to `SQLLog` because it's a better name for that.

Maybe we should finally move these `loadXXXSetting` into the `XXXInit`
function? Any idea?

---------

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-02-20 00:12:01 +08:00
Brecht Van Lommel
6221a6fd54
Scoped labels (#22585)
Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the
label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/`
prefix can be set on an issue.

The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example
`scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in
different scopes and can coexist.

Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they
are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically
removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a
new label or replacing all labels.

In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as
radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a
single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be
used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and
batch editing.

Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification:

* Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips
everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus.
* In label list, show description below label same as label menus.
* Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer.
* Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance
in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is
closer to perceptually linear.
* Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing
only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling.
* Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function.

Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu:

* Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing.
* Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate
lines.
* Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu.
* Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and
consistent with settings layout elsewhere.

Custom exclusive scoped label rendering:

* Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and
lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them
similar to the `/` symbol.
* In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line.

---------

Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2023-02-18 21:17:39 +02:00
yp05327
bd66fa586a
Rename repo.GetOwner to repo.LoadOwner (#22967)
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22963

---------

Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
2023-02-18 20:11:03 +08:00
Zettat123
0ab22a1a02
fix incorrect role labels for migrated issues and comments (#22914)
Fix #22797.

## Reason
If a comment was migrated from other platforms, this comment may have an
original author and its poster is always not the original author. When
the `roleDescriptor` func get the poster's role descriptor for a
comment, it does not check if the comment has an original author. So the
migrated comments' original authors might be marked as incorrect roles.

---------

Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-15 12:29:13 -05:00
wxiaoguang
24a9caa2f3
Fix more HTMLURL in templates (#22831)
I haven't tested `runs_list.tmpl` but I think it could be right.

After this PR, besides the `<meta .. HTMLURL>` in html head, the only
explicit HTMLURL usage is in `pull_merge_instruction.tmpl`, which
doesn't affect users too much and it's difficult to fix at the moment.

There are still many usages of `AppUrl` in the templates (eg: the
package help manual), they are similar problems as the HTMLURL in
pull_merge_instruction, and they might be fixed together in the future.

Diff without space:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22831/files?diff=unified&w=1
2023-02-09 11:31:30 -05:00
Lunny Xiao
769be877f2
Use link in UI which returned a relative url but not html_url which contains an absolute url (#21986)
partially fix #19345

This PR add some `Link` methods for different objects. The `Link`
methods are not different from `HTMLURL`, they are lack of the absolute
URL. And most of UI `HTMLURL` have been replaced to `Link` so that users
can visit them from a different domain or IP.

This PR also introduces a new javascript configuration
`window.config.reqAppUrl` which is different from `appUrl` which is
still an absolute url but the domain has been replaced to the current
requested domain.
2023-02-06 12:09:18 -06:00
Jason Song
d74d16a4b1
Set PR for issue when load attributes for PRs (#22766)
A missing patch for #22650.
2023-02-05 08:24:43 -06:00
Jason Song
c18a62279a
Fix time to NotifyPullRequestSynchronized (#22650)
Should call `PushToBaseRepo` before
`notification.NotifyPullRequestSynchronized`.

Or the notifier will get an old commit when reading branch
`pull/xxx/head`.

Found by ~#21937~ #22679.

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-05 19:57:38 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
8574a6433f
Show all projects, not just repo projects and open/closed projects (#22640)
This PR fixes two problems. One is when filter repository issues, only
repository level projects are listed. Another is if you list open
issues, only open projects will be displayed in filter options and if
you list closed issues, only closed projects will be displayed in filter
options.

In this PR, both repository level and org/user level projects will be
displayed in filter, and both open and closed projects will be listed as
filter items.

---------

Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-02-04 22:35:08 +08:00
zeripath
3c5655ce18
Improve trace logging for pulls and processes (#22633)
Our trace logging is far from perfect and is difficult to follow.

This PR:

* Add trace logging for process manager add and remove.
* Fixes an errant read file for git refs in getMergeCommit
* Brings in the pullrequest `String` and `ColorFormat` methods
introduced in #22568
* Adds a lot more logging in to testPR etc.

Ref #22578

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2023-02-03 18:11:48 -05:00
Lunny Xiao
4e946e5a7d
Small refactor for loading PRs (#22652) 2023-02-01 21:49:28 -06:00
Jason Song
4011821c94
Implement actions (#21937)
Close #13539.

Co-authored by: @lunny @appleboy @fuxiaohei and others.

Related projects:
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-go
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner

### Summary

The target of this PR is to bring a basic implementation of "Actions",
an internal CI/CD system of Gitea. That means even though it has been
merged, the state of the feature is **EXPERIMENTAL**, and please note
that:

- It is disabled by default;
- It shouldn't be used in a production environment currently;
- It shouldn't be used in a public Gitea instance currently;
- Breaking changes may be made before it's stable.

**Please comment on #13539 if you have any different product design
ideas**, all decisions reached there will be adopted here. But in this
PR, we don't talk about **naming, feature-creep or alternatives**.

### ⚠️ Breaking

`gitea-actions` will become a reserved user name. If a user with the
name already exists in the database, it is recommended to rename it.

### Some important reviews

- What is `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` in `app.ini` for?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1055954954
- Why the api for runners is not under the normal `/api/v1` prefix?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061173592
- Why DBFS?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061301178
- Why ignore events triggered by `gitea-actions` bot?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1063254103
- Why there's no permission control for actions?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1090229868

### What it looks like

<details>

#### Manage runners

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205870657-c72f590e-2e08-4cd4-be7f-2e0abb299bbf.png">

#### List runs

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872794-50fde990-2b45-48c1-a178-908e4ec5b627.png">


#### View logs

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872501-9b7b9000-9542-4991-8f55-18ccdada77c3.png">



</details>

### How to try it

<details>

#### 1. Start Gitea

Clone this branch and [install from
source](https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/install-from-source).

Add additional configurations in `app.ini` to enable Actions:

```ini
[actions]
ENABLED = true
```

Start it.

If all is well, you'll see the management page of runners:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205877365-8e30a780-9b10-4154-b3e8-ee6c3cb35a59.png">


#### 2. Start runner

Clone the [act_runner](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner), and follow
the
[README](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/src/branch/main/README.md)
to start it.

If all is well, you'll see a new runner has been added:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205878000-216f5937-e696-470d-b66c-8473987d91c3.png">

#### 3. Enable actions for a repo

Create a new repo or open an existing one, check the `Actions` checkbox
in settings and submit.

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879705-53e09208-73c0-4b3e-a123-2dcf9aba4b9c.png">
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879383-23f3d08f-1a85-41dd-a8b3-54e2ee6453e8.png">

If all is well, you'll see a new tab "Actions":

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205881648-a8072d8c-5803-4d76-b8a8-9b2fb49516c1.png">

#### 4. Upload workflow files

Upload some workflow files to `.gitea/workflows/xxx.yaml`, you can
follow the [quickstart](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/quickstart)
of GitHub Actions. Yes, Gitea Actions is compatible with GitHub Actions
in most cases, you can use the same demo:

```yaml
name: GitHub Actions Demo
run-name: ${{ github.actor }} is testing out GitHub Actions 🚀
on: [push]
jobs:
  Explore-GitHub-Actions:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - run: echo "🎉 The job was automatically triggered by a ${{ github.event_name }} event."
      - run: echo "🐧 This job is now running on a ${{ runner.os }} server hosted by GitHub!"
      - run: echo "🔎 The name of your branch is ${{ github.ref }} and your repository is ${{ github.repository }}."
      - name: Check out repository code
        uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - run: echo "💡 The ${{ github.repository }} repository has been cloned to the runner."
      - run: echo "🖥️ The workflow is now ready to test your code on the runner."
      - name: List files in the repository
        run: |
          ls ${{ github.workspace }}
      - run: echo "🍏 This job's status is ${{ job.status }}."
```

If all is well, you'll see a new run in `Actions` tab:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884473-79a874bc-171b-4aaf-acd5-0241a45c3b53.png">

#### 5. Check the logs of jobs

Click a run and you'll see the logs:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884800-994b0374-67f7-48ff-be9a-4c53f3141547.png">

#### 6. Go on

You can try more examples in [the
documents](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions)
of GitHub Actions, then you might find a lot of bugs.

Come on, PRs are welcome.

</details>

See also: [Feature Preview: Gitea
Actions](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/12/feature-preview-gitea-actions/)

---------

Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-01-31 09:45:19 +08:00
techknowlogick
e88b529b31
Issues: add Project filter to issues list and search (#22544)
Currently only a single project like milestone, not multiple like
labels.

Implements #14298

Code by @brechtvl

---------

Co-authored-by: Brecht Van Lommel <brecht@blender.org>
2023-01-29 11:45:29 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
6fe3c8b398
Support org/user level projects (#22235)
Fix #13405

<img width="1151" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/209442911-7baa3924-c389-47b6-b63b-a740803e640e.png">

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2023-01-20 19:42:33 +08:00
Sybren
151b1a9508
Support importing comment types (#22510)
This commit adds support for specifying comment types when importing
with `gitea restore-repo`. It makes it possible to import issue changes,
such as "title changed" or "assigned user changed".

An earlier version of this pull request was made by Matti Ranta, in
https://future.projects.blender.org/blender-migration/gitea-bf/pulls/3

There are two changes with regard to Matti's original code:

1. The comment type was an `int64` in Matti's code, and is now using a
string. This makes it possible to use `comment_type: title`, which is
more reliable and future-proof than an index into an internal list in
the Gitea Go code.

2. Matti's code also had support for including labels, but in a way that
would require knowing the database ID of the labels before the import
even starts, which is impossible. This can be solved by using label
names instead of IDs; for simplicity I I left that out of this PR.
2023-01-18 21:14:56 -05:00
Lunny Xiao
db2286bbb6
some refactor about code comments (#20821) 2023-01-17 15:03:44 -06:00
Lunny Xiao
2782c14396
Supports wildcard protected branch (#20825)
This PR introduce glob match for protected branch name. The separator is
`/` and you can use `*` matching non-separator chars and use `**` across
separator.

It also supports input an exist or non-exist branch name as matching
condition and branch name condition has high priority than glob rule.

Should fix #2529 and #15705

screenshots

<img width="1160" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/205651179-ebb5492a-4ade-4bb4-a13c-965e8c927063.png">

Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
2023-01-16 16:00:22 +08:00
Jimmy Praet
fe519d8633
Restore previous official review when an official review is deleted (#22449)
Fix #22406

Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2023-01-15 07:00:09 +02:00
Jason Song
477a1cc40e
Improve utils of slices (#22379)
- Move the file `compare.go` and `slice.go` to `slice.go`.
- Fix `ExistsInSlice`, it's buggy
  - It uses `sort.Search`, so it assumes that the input slice is sorted.
- It passes `func(i int) bool { return slice[i] == target })` to
`sort.Search`, that's incorrect, check the doc of `sort.Search`.
- Conbine `IsInt64InSlice(int64, []int64)` and `ExistsInSlice(string,
[]string)` to `SliceContains[T]([]T, T)`.
- Conbine `IsSliceInt64Eq([]int64, []int64)` and `IsEqualSlice([]string,
[]string)` to `SliceSortedEqual[T]([]T, T)`.
- Add `SliceEqual[T]([]T, T)` as a distinction from
`SliceSortedEqual[T]([]T, T)`.
- Redesign `RemoveIDFromList([]int64, int64) ([]int64, bool)` to
`SliceRemoveAll[T]([]T, T) []T`.
- Add `SliceContainsFunc[T]([]T, func(T) bool)` and
`SliceRemoveAllFunc[T]([]T, func(T) bool)` for general use.
- Add comments to explain why not `golang.org/x/exp/slices`.
- Add unit tests.
2023-01-11 13:31:16 +08:00
Jason Song
7adc2de464
Use context parameter in models/git (#22367)
After #22362, we can feel free to use transactions without
`db.DefaultContext`.

And there are still lots of models using `db.DefaultContext`, I think we
should refactor them carefully and one by one.

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-01-09 11:50:54 +08:00
Jason Song
6135359a04
Always reuse transaction (#22362) 2023-01-08 09:34:58 +08:00
Jason Song
71ca3067bc
Check primary keys for all tables and drop ForeignReference (#21721)
Some dbs require that all tables have primary keys, see
- #16802
- #21086

We can add a test to keep it from being broken again.

Edit:

~Added missing primary key for `ForeignReference`~ Dropped the
`ForeignReference` table to satisfy the check, so it closes #21086.

More context can be found in comments.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
2022-12-23 19:35:43 +08:00