adjustments

src/main/cljc/org/domaindrivenarchitecture/activity_pub_poc/activitystreams2.cljc

@@ -4,7 +4,6 @@
             [org.domaindrivenarchitecture.activity-pub-poc.owl :as owl]
             [org.domaindrivenarchitecture.activity-pub-poc.xsd :as xsd]))
 
-; TODO gec: what is this needed for?
 (defn-spec 
   is-functional-property? boolean?
   "Checks whether spec is a FunctionalProperty."
@@ -12,29 +11,70 @@
   (some #(clojure.string/includes? % "FunctionalProperty") (s/describe spec)))
 
 (defn-spec map-class-spec s/spec?
-  "Spec which checks whether a value is a ::owl/Class 
+  "Spec which checks whether a value is a ::Class 
    and if it is a map, if it validates the given map-spec."
   [map-spec s/spec?]
   (s/and
-   ::owl/Class
+   ::Class
    (s/or
     :no-map #(not (map? %))
     :map map-spec)))
 
 ;=======================
 
+;TODO: There is no as:Class! Why do we need this?
+;Answer jem: I do not want to enhance owl/Class inline from here.
+(s/def
+  ::Class
+  (s/and ::owl/Class))
+
+;=======================
+
 ;http://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#object
 (s/def ::Object
   (s/and
-   ::owl/Class
+   ::Class
    (s/keys :opt-un [::id ::type ::attachment])))
 
 ;http://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Link
 (s/def ::Link 
   (s/and
-   ::owl/Class
+   ::Class
    (s/keys :opt-un [::id ::type])))
 
+;http://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Activity
+;TODO: Define more properties necessary for Like
+(s/def ::Activity 
+  (s/and
+   ::Class
+   ::Object
+   (s/keys :opt-un [::result ::object])))
+
+;http://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Relationship
+;We only have this class, since the property "object" is in the domain "Activity" and "Relationship"
+; TODO: What means: "as:Relationship a rdf:Statement". Relevant for spec?
+(s/def ::Relationship
+  (s/and
+   ::Class
+   ::Object
+   (s/keys :opt-un [::object])))
+
+;http://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Like
+(s/def ::Like
+  (s/and
+   ::Class
+   ::Activity))
+
+;http://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#attachment
+; TODO: Why do we need to model this? Is this necessary for a Like-Activity?
+(s/def ::attachment
+  (s/and 
+   ::owl/ObjectProperty
+   (map-class-spec
+    (s/or
+     :object ::Object
+     :link ::Link))))
+
 ;http://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#id
 (s/def ::id
   (s/and ::owl/DatatypeProperty
@@ -49,15 +89,6 @@
   )
 
 
-;http://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Activity
-;TODO: Define more properties necessary for Like
-(s/def ::Activity 
-  (s/and
-   ::owl/Class
-   ::Object
-   (s/keys :opt-un [::result ::object])))
-
-
 ;http://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#result
 (s/def ::result 
   (s/and 
@@ -66,15 +97,6 @@
     (s/or :object ::Object
           :link ::Link))))
 
-;http://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Relationship
-;We only have this class, since the property "object" is in the domain "Activity" and "Relationship"
-; TODO: What means: "as:Relationship a rdf:Statement". Relevant for spec?
-(s/def ::Relationship
-  (s/and
-   ::owl/Class
-   ::Object
-   (s/keys :opt-un [::object])))
-
 ;http://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#object
 (s/def ::object 
   (s/and
@@ -103,29 +125,9 @@
   (s/and ::Class))
 (s/def ::Link link-type)
 
-;http://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#attachment
-; TODO: Why do we need to model this? Is this necessary for a Like-Activity?
-(s/def ::attachment
-  (s/and 
-   ::owl/ObjectProperty
-   (map-class-spec
-    (s/or
-     :object ::Object
-     :link ::Link))))
-
-;http://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Like
-(s/def ::Like
-  (s/and 
-   ::owl/Class
-   ::Activity))
 
 
 
-;=============
 
-;TODO: There is no as:Class! Why do we need this?
-;Answer jem: I do not want to enhance owl/Class inline from here.
-(s/def
-  ::Class
-  (s/and ::owl/Class))
+